Comments for EcoToaD

Comment on Is your skin clean? Toxic Cosmetic Ingredients you should avoid by Anne Smith

Anne Smith — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:49:12 +0000

Almost every shampoo I’ve seen contains Sodium Laureth Sulfate, and I never knew it was potentially dangerous until reading this post.

Comment on Is your skin clean? Toxic Cosmetic Ingredients you should avoid by www.sensipics.com

www.sensipics.com — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:06:32 +0000

You couldn’t be more on the level

Comment on Nature won’t give us a bailout by Explore Nature

Explore Nature — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:33:23 +0000

Even today people do not care too much about the environmental values. Nature will hardly punish in future all of us. Complicated weather condition in everywhere is the most bad sign.

Comment on Self Sufficient Buildings and Vertical Farms for the Future by CJQ

CJQ — Thu, 19 May 2011 00:54:51 +0000

Hi Sonia, I wanted to reference you for a research assignment that I am doing and was wondering if you wouldn’t mind just to give me full name details so I can reference you? Thanks. You may reply to me on email.

Comment on Engulfed by Plastic by Trash Hurts. « Nature Calendar

Trash Hurts. « Nature Calendar — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:54:20 +0000

[...] Animals who aren’t able to free themselves can often be killed or maimed by plastic trash. [...]

Comment on Is your skin clean? Toxic Cosmetic Ingredients you should avoid by Robyn

Robyn — Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:04:41 +0000

Great post. I had never paid close attention to the ingredients in my lotions until my 5 year old daughter broke out on 2 different occasions due to an allergic reaction from my lotion.

Comment on Will REDD help save our Forests? by Carolina

Carolina — Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:00:28 +0000

I am not familiar with all that but as long as the cap and trade exists the future of the planet is doom. Obviously it is much more profitable for a company to invest on environmental solutions in poorer countries, as it is cheaper to do it, than reduce their own emission so they can pollute the same or even more. Perhaps it would be better to wonder why are the forest in danger. Maybe it is to supply the “artificial” needs of people on developed countries and keep economy going. Would not be better to change the horizons of the occidental people in order to solve the problem? Probably it would, but that would end not only with the environmental problems, but also with the “reign” of those with power. The enemy of the forest is the money, that is the capitalism, from my point of view.
So for those who think that the company investments on reduction of deforestation will imply gaining rights to give out the same or even more CO2 emissions, I agree with you.

Comment on The Big Spill by tracy

tracy — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:32:43 +0000

These images are terrible, but the worse part is most of America has already forgotten about the spill and the damage that is still done to the environment.

Comment on Self Sufficient Buildings and Vertical Farms for the Future by Michael David Lipkan

Michael David Lipkan — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:42:31 +0000

Modular architecture will be crucial when public perception changes because of initial vertical farm constructs. At that time, modular architecture will make it possible to scale up designs and ramp up production of farm components for distribution around the world.

Comment on Self Sufficient Buildings and Vertical Farms for the Future by ecotoad

ecotoad — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:28:25 +0000

Yes indeed, there is a LOT of potential out there to become more sustainable societies!